Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

AMD Catalyst vs. Radeon Gallium3D On Linux 3.1

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • AMD Catalyst vs. Radeon Gallium3D On Linux 3.1

    Phoronix: AMD Catalyst vs. Radeon Gallium3D On Linux 3.1

    If you are not taken by today's release of Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot", here are some new Radeon graphics benchmarks comparing the Catalyst driver on Ubuntu 11.10 to the latest R600g driver from Mesa 7.12-devel on the soon-to-be-released Linux 3.1 kernel.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=16517

  • #2
    VDrift benchmarks are meaningless

    There's no point in continuously showing the VDrift performance results with the Gallium drivers if the rendering output is so horribly broken. That's equivalent to benchmarking AES encryption that spits out invalid data.

    Comment


    • #3
      I think it would be more relevant for the open source driver audience to review 2D and compositing.
      Also in this case CPU/RAM/power consumption would be more important than raw performance.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by gigaplex View Post
        There's no point in continuously showing the VDrift performance results with the Gallium drivers if the rendering output is so horribly broken. That's equivalent to benchmarking AES encryption that spits out invalid data.
        Perhaps update to the latest version of VDrift that was released a month ago?

        Comment


        • #5
          It would be interesting to see what the results would look like benchmarking the git head of mesa form the release dates of 2.6.39 3.0 & 3.1

          As improvements happen in tandem to drm and mesa it would give a fairer picture of the improvements in the 3D stack

          Comment


          • #6
            A new drm is not going to change 3D performance much. For 3D, the drm just takes the command buffer from the 3D driver and feeds it to the hw; not a lot has changed in that regard.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by MatthiasF View Post
              I think it would be more relevant for the open source driver audience to review 2D and compositing.
              Also in this case CPU/RAM/power consumption would be more important than raw performance.
              I agree. I measured a few days ago my computer's power consumption, and I was shocked: The open source driver consumes 40W more than the official in idle (I have an 5770 in an arch linux machine).

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by bbandi View Post
                I agree. I measured a few days ago my computer's power consumption, and I was shocked: The open source driver consumes 40W more than the official in idle (I have an 5770 in an arch linux machine).
                Did you set it to low power profile?

                I run all my cards in low (plenty for desktop performance) and switch to high performance only for games.

                Comment


                • #9
                  @Michael and others: How's the stability with the OSS radeon drivers recently? I'm asking because I'm using Fedora 15 and get random system hangs with my 5870 since the update to kernel 2.6.38.7 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=712533) which sucks HARD. Don't have any stability problems on my Samsung N140 netbook...

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    The VDrift racing game results remain mixed, which is due to Mesa/Gallium3D not handling some of the shaders correctly and other incorrect renderings.
                    Wrong. It's because of Catalyst not handling some of the shaders correctly. The shaders are broken and shouldn't compile on a compliant driver. And you also need floating-point textures to render everything correctly, but I guess you already know that.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by pingufunkybeat View Post
                      Did you set it to low power profile?
                      How do you do that?

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by pingufunkybeat View Post
                        Did you set it to low power profile?
                        I tried the following:
                        -"radeon.dynpm=1" kernel option
                        -Disabling KMS and enabling "DynamicPM"/ "ClockGating" in xorg.conf
                        -Also tried "ForceLowPowerMode", but this gave me a black screen.

                        I forgot to try the sysfs methode, but I will try it soon.

                        @leif81 Check this:
                        https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Ati#Powersaving

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by leif81 View Post
                          How do you do that?

                          https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/ATI#Powersaving (applicable to all distros)

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Never will understand the point of comparing Radeon to Catalyst. That's about the same as comparing VW Golf to some Jaguar. Pointless.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Reloaded211 View Post
                              Never will understand the point of comparing Radeon to Catalyst. That's about the same as comparing VW Golf to some Jaguar. Pointless.
                              Not at all...

                              r600g is a software which can be improved over time, and it will be. One day I hope it will reach the performance level of Catalyst.
                              In the other hand, explain me how to improve a VW so that over time it will be as performant and luxurious as a Jaguar.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X