Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

AMD Toying With XvMC In Gallium3D R300 Driver

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • AMD Toying With XvMC In Gallium3D R300 Driver

    Phoronix: AMD Toying With XvMC In Gallium3D R300 Driver

    XvMC support came to Gallium3D through a Google Summer of Code project for 2008 that involved getting X-Video Motion Compensation running atop the Nouveau driver with NVIDIA hardware. We described this work in The State Of Gallium3D Video Decoding and subsequently in Nouveau's Gallium3D Driver Gets Video Boost...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=Nzk1Mw

  • #2
    This is interesting news. Is there any insight into what exactly this may pertain for the future? I was under the impression that ATI hardware was not capable of XvMC playback, has it always just been that the drivers do not expose the hardware through this particular API?? It seems silly if the latter were the case.

    Basically, I'm asking which cards would one day be capable of supporting this, if there were developer commitment and enough time?

    Comment


    • #3
      The hardware is capable and the documentation is available, but no one has written the code yet.

      Comment


      • #4
        good news the opensource devs become 5 ***** hero stars from my pocket!

        Comment


        • #5
          Great news!
          Does it mean that I could have even better video acceleration than Xv on my R3xx cards?

          Comment


          • #6
            Now presumably, this means R300 through R500, correct?

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by droidhacker View Post
              Now presumably, this means R300 through R500, correct?
              r3xx through r7xx as far as documentation goes. the gallium driver in question in only r3xx through r5xx.

              Comment


              • #8
                XvMC? Oh come on, this is useless. Hardly anyone needs MPEG2 decode acceleration nowadays. Besides, it would make more sense to support a modern API like VDPAU/VA-API instead of XvMC, even if it's just for MPEG2.

                Comment


                • #9
                  ALL features are important!

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by brent View Post
                    XvMC? Oh come on, this is useless. Hardly anyone needs MPEG2 decode acceleration nowadays. Besides, it would make more sense to support a modern API like VDPAU/VA-API instead of XvMC, even if it's just for MPEG2.
                    The information is all there. Patches are welcome. It just so happens that the XvMC code is already in place in gallium so much of the work is already done in that case.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X