Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mir Gets Workaround For Visual Glitches, Corruption

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Mir Gets Workaround For Visual Glitches, Corruption

    Phoronix: Mir Gets Workaround For Visual Glitches, Corruption

    While Mir's composite bypass support can dramatically improve the performance for Linux OpenGL games running on the Ubuntu display server, some Intel and AMD users have experienced on-screen corruption and other visual glitches when relying upon XMir since the bypass support was merged...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTQ2MTA

  • #2
    Originally posted by BO$$ View Post
    The speed at which Canonical is progressing in their quest for domination shows us what we already know but most won't admit: they are the de facto FOSS leaders. Apple derived Mac OS X from BSD, Ubuntu is derived from Linux. This is how it should be: a corporation takes what the open source guys do and creates a true OS under a strong leadership. That is what is missing in the Linux community. Luckily for the consumers there is Shuttleworth that will do what Jobs did with BSD, transform it into a real OS, not a kiddie joke. And just as Apple did a lot of things differently from BSD, so will Ubuntu diverge from Linux. It takes a real focus on the consumers to create an alternative to Windows. Good times ahead: Microsoft, Apple and Canonical, the new holy trinity.
    LOL. That's a much better trolling attempt than you were doing before you got banned. Good to see the time off got you back into the game.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by BO$$ View Post
      The speed at which Canonical is progressing in their quest for domination shows us what we already know but most won't admit: they are the de facto FOSS leaders. Apple derived Mac OS X from BSD, Ubuntu is derived from Linux. This is how it should be: a corporation takes what the open source guys do and creates a true OS under a strong leadership. That is what is missing in the Linux community. Luckily for the consumers there is Shuttleworth that will do what Jobs did with BSD, transform it into a real OS, not a kiddie joke. And just as Apple did a lot of things differently from BSD, so will Ubuntu diverge from Linux. It takes a real focus on the consumers to create an alternative to Windows. Good times ahead: Microsoft, Apple and Canonical, the new holy trinity.

      Let's say that Canonical is doing a good job. That's it!

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by BO$$ View Post
        The speed at which Canonical is progressing in their quest for domination shows us what we already know but most won't admit: they are the de facto FOSS leaders. Apple derived Mac OS X from BSD, Ubuntu is derived from Linux. This is how it should be: a corporation takes what the open source guys do and creates a true OS under a strong leadership. That is what is missing in the Linux community. Luckily for the consumers there is Shuttleworth that will do what Jobs did with BSD, transform it into a real OS, not a kiddie joke. And just as Apple did a lot of things differently from BSD, so will Ubuntu diverge from Linux. It takes a real focus on the consumers to create an alternative to Windows. Good times ahead: Microsoft, Apple and Canonical, the new holy trinity.
        I hear you. But there are a few problems with this reasoning.

        1. The goal is to create a FOSS OS. Not just an OS derived from FOSS elements. We already have two very functional OSes. (And yes I use Windows 8 and Server 2012 at home and would take a bullet for them, especially the later.)
        2. There is already "strong leadership" in the FOSS world. Both Red Hat and Attachmate are well based corporations.
        3. The crucial difference is not that we don't have strong leadership, but that only Canonical tries to make a distro with good usability for desktop users. Both RHEL and SLES are abortions, when it comes to polish and user friendliness. If anything, ironically, Debian, the grandpa distro, is light years more user friendly than RHEL. It actually has MP3 support out of the box, an ample repo, and a package management system that works well.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by BO$$ View Post
          Microsoft, Apple and Canonical, the new [un]holy trinity.
          This is what I can whole heartedly agree to. It will keep on being the same old shovelware and the masses will forever be relegated to eat up what the masters serve them. But who am I to judge people who like to be put behind the bars of the paddy waggon instead of being in the driver seat?

          So the world of GNU/Linux will soldier on, welcoming everyone who can engage their brain for more than two minutes a day. The rest of the masses will very soon have three options of crapware to choose from.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by garegin View Post
            I hear you. But there are a few problems with this reasoning.

            1. The goal is to create a FOSS OS. Not just an OS derived from FOSS elements.
            Agree. Thankfully all Canonical products are GPL and that guarantees that they will always be free.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by zoomblab View Post
              Agree. Thankfully all Canonical products are GPL and that guarantees that they will always be free.
              CLA... Canonical is not the FSF.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by r_a_trip View Post
                CLA... Canonical is not the FSF.
                CLA can't take away any of the freedoms from the users. That is why GPL is great. What it does is foster a safer environment for the principal developer. CLA is irrelevant for those who are into FOSS for the freedom and at the same time is good for business.

                Comment


                • #9
                  How come a thread on Wayland comes and goes un-trolled and on topic, but every Ubuntu/Mir/Unity thread gets derailed and trolled within minutes?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by zoomblab View Post
                    CLA can take away all of the freedoms from the users. That is why GPL alone is great. What it does is foster a free (as a beer) environment for Canonical. CLA is deleterious for those who are into FOSS for the freedom and at the same time is good for Canonical to transform third party GPL code in closed source software and to do it in a non reciprocal manner without any obligation in regard of FOSS developers.
                    Fixed

                    blablabla
                    blablabla
                    blablabla
                    blablabla

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by dh04000 View Post
                      How come a thread on Wayland comes and goes un-trolled and on topic, but every Ubuntu/Mir/Unity thread gets derailed and trolled within minutes?
                      Because people have nothing better to do it seems besides bash something.

                      I came here to hear about the discussion of the Mir visual glitch workaround, not some (imo) fail opinions of something totally unrelated.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by BO$$ View Post
                        Microsoft, Apple and Canonical, the new holy trinity.
                        Intel could buy RedHat and become a major Linux (services/consulting) player. Given their common interest in Wayland, they could ramp up both - coding and marketing effort to a point where Canonical would be put out of existence....

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by MartinN View Post
                          Intel could buy RedHat and become a major Linux (services/consulting) player. Given their common interest in Wayland, they could ramp up both - coding and marketing effort to a point where Canonical would be put out of existence....
                          And why exactly would you want Canonical to be out of existence? I'm not the biggest fan of Windows, but I don't go around wishing utter destruction of Microsoft... I just go use something else

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Espionage724 View Post
                            And why exactly would you want Canonical to be out of existence? I'm not the biggest fan of Windows, but I don't go around wishing utter destruction of Microsoft... I just go use something else
                            Just speculating in a different manner than BO$$... that's all. I don't wish Canonical anything except a return to the light - Wayland.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by MartinN View Post
                              Intel could buy RedHat and become a major Linux (services/consulting) player. Given their common interest in Wayland, they could ramp up both - coding and marketing effort to a point where Canonical would be put out of existence....
                              Microsoft would buy out Intel before they let that happen. Look at how they purchased Nokia once they found out they were working on an Android phone.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X