Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Intel Makes First Release Of Linux OpenCL Project

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by rikkinho View Post
    I do not live in the basement of my mother's house as you piece of s****, if you do not like to hear truths is your problem
    I think I heard your mom calling you to clean your room.

    Comment


    • #17
      lol

      Originally posted by airlied View Post
      I think I heard your mom calling you to clean your room.

      i like you, one think i don t undertand how you represent X.org, but ok, people like you destroy and fragment linux =) but think are great

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by rikkinho View Post
        i like you, one think i don t undertand how you represent X.org, but ok, people like you destroy and fragment linux =) but think are great
        So Intel comes up with another implementation of OpenCL (=actively fragments OpenCL development) and you accuse people that are opposed to it of fragmentation?
        That doesn't make sense at all.

        Comment


        • #19
          Can we expect this to be full of AMDCripple functions too?

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Vim_User View Post
            So Intel comes up with another implementation of OpenCL (=actively fragments OpenCL development) and you accuse people that are opposed to it of fragmentation?
            That doesn't make sense at all.
            he also called me a cancer, all from the safety of his mom's basement.

            Dave.

            Comment


            • #21
              =)

              Originally posted by airlied View Post
              he also called me a cancer, all from the safety of his mom's basement.

              Dave.
              muaah, when i see mir destroy your work call me girl

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by Vim_User View Post
                So Intel comes up with another implementation of OpenCL (=actively fragments OpenCL development) and you accuse people that are opposed to it of fragmentation?
                That doesn't make sense at all.
                First off, there's nothing wrong or special with Intel doing it's own OpenCL implementation:
                https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenCL...entation_dates

                Secondly, while I completely agree that this specific effort is very wasteful, It's only 0.1 release and it's quite small. So if the Gallium3D devs are right and it's duplicating a lot of code, then it shouldn't be a whole lot of work working it into Gallium3D.

                Besides, this is graphics we're talking about: Intel is competing against AMD and ARM on the SoC so it might make business sense for them to go solo.

                After all, it's still LLVM (and not gcc) with a backend and as long as it's still FOSS...

                Mind you LLVM is in the same sense a "fragmentation" of GCC. I think the competition has been doing good to both.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by rikkinho View Post
                  muaah, when i see mir destroy your work call me girl
                  Oh, so you're just a Canonitroll. Now it makes sense.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by rikkinho View Post
                    I do not live in the basement of my mother's house as you piece of shit, if you do not like to hear truths is your problem
                    A n00b's "truth"?
                    Stop barking here and read mesa.
                    Originally posted by c117152 View Post
                    First off, there's nothing wrong or special with Intel doing it's own OpenCL implementation:
                    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenCL...entation_dates

                    Secondly, while I completely agree that this specific effort is very wasteful, It's only 0.1 release and it's quite small. So if the Gallium3D devs are right and it's duplicating a lot of code, then it shouldn't be a whole lot of work working it into Gallium3D.

                    Besides, this is graphics we're talking about: Intel is competing against AMD and ARM on the SoC so it might make business sense for them to go solo.

                    After all, it's still LLVM (and not gcc) with a backend and as long as it's still FOSS...

                    Mind you LLVM is in the same sense a "fragmentation" of GCC. I think the competition has been doing good to both.
                    In my view this is very very simple story:
                    Someone wrote an OpenCL lib as a hobby work and others think it's waste of time for a serious OpenCL lib.
                    That's it.
                    Last edited by zxy_thf; 04-17-2013, 03:57 AM.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by zxy_thf View Post
                      A n00b's "truth"?
                      Stop barking here and read mesa.

                      In my view this is very very simple story:
                      Someone wrote an OpenCL lib as a hobby work and others think it's waste of time for a serious OpenCL lib.
                      That's it.
                      Well, you made me look. I wouldn't say hobby work:
                      http://cgit.freedesktop.org/beignet/log/

                      It seems like the recent commits took a sizeable code and brought it up to specs and fixed a few bugs and such. Make your own conclusions, I personally don't know anything about OpenCL and couldn't care less about the politics

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X