No announcement yet.

Catalyst 8.8 and poorer performance

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by bridgman View Post
    For anyone seeing slower performance with 8.8 try the "nopat" boot option to disable the use of PAT and see if that helps.
    I wonder if there is more to it than just PAT.

    I just built a vanilla and

    # CONFIG_X86_PAT is not set

    but I now see glitching in the ut2004 demo which does not happen with 8-8 on a (whose config was used to build the 26.3).


    • #12

      Tried the nopat option: little improvement, but still slower than 8-7

      8-7: ~2100fps
      8-8: ~1500fps
      8-8(nopat): ~1680fps

      returned to 8-7 and got the 2100fps
      also 8-6 yeilded about 2300fps, but was pretty unusable, prior to 8-6 it was consistantly ~2000-2100fps

      I know glxgears isn't a true benchmark, but it works for comparing results on the same machine to some extent. Besides I can barely play ut2004 on 8-8 now the frame rate is so bad.

      As far as stability: 8-5 and 8-6 segfaulted on just about anything. 8-7 works nicely. 8-8 has crashed my system a couple of times (once on when switching a youtube video from fullscreen, and another time when playing around with gxine's visualations.)

      Ubuntu 8.04 64bit
      2.6.24-21-generic #1 SMP Mon Aug 25 16:57:51 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux
      Gigabyte GA-MA78GM-S2H: (3200 IGP)
      AMD AthlonX2 4850e
      4g ram