Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

AMD Puts Out A New Catalyst Linux Graphics Driver

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    By the way, weeks ago a new legacy Catalyst 13.9 driver was released for Windows 7. Windows 8 and Linux users are still stuck with 13.1

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by d2kx View Post
      I also expect R9 290 improvements, but that is something for Michael to try.
      Yesterday I bought XFX R9 290, and tried both drivers (this one and previous), there is no noticeable difference in Sam3. Also, OpenGL driver build number is same in both drivers.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by siavashserver View Post
        By the way, weeks ago a new legacy Catalyst 13.9 driver was released for Windows 7. Windows 8 and Linux users are still stuck with 13.1
        I tried 13.9-legacy on my test PCs win Win7, it does not changes anything, still same bugs as with 13.1-legacy.

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by leonmaxx View Post
          test PCs win Win7
          test PCs with Win7*

          Seems like AMD waiting for next stable driver release and then also release a legacy driver.

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by leonmaxx View Post
            I tried 13.9-legacy on my test PCs win Win7, it does not changes anything, still same bugs as with 13.1-legacy.
            What kind of bugs?

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by mmstick View Post
              It's called open source radeon drivers. You should try it some time; works a lot better.
              I have used legacy for about a year, a couple weeks ago I was finally forced to switch back to open source when upgrading Fedora 17 -> 19. As many people will say, 2D desktop performance is great (scrolling much smoother). However, my 2D engine only runs at about 70% of the catalyst speed (unless I use "high" profile). Also, timer queries perform really weird on the FOSS driver because even after a full frame cycle after having ended the query, the results will still not be available for quite some time (this never happened on legacy). Other than that the FOSS driver is pretty cool, and finally being relieved from the fear of Xorg/Kernel updates was definitely worth it.

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by Ancurio View Post
                I have used legacy for about a year, a couple weeks ago I was finally forced to switch back to open source when upgrading Fedora 17 -> 19. As many people will say, 2D desktop performance is great (scrolling much smoother). However, my 2D engine only runs at about 70% of the catalyst speed (unless I use "high" profile). Also, timer queries perform really weird on the FOSS driver because even after a full frame cycle after having ended the query, the results will still not be available for quite some time (this never happened on legacy). Other than that the FOSS driver is pretty cool, and finally being relieved from the fear of Xorg/Kernel updates was definitely worth it.
                1) Did You tested 2D perf in both scenarios? Maybe r600g do not need to overclock it?
                2) File bug. Get to IRC. Maybe You will even get fix in 3h time

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by Ancurio View Post
                  I have used legacy for about a year, a couple weeks ago I was finally forced to switch back to open source when upgrading Fedora 17 -> 19. As many people will say, 2D desktop performance is great (scrolling much smoother). However, my 2D engine only runs at about 70% of the catalyst speed (unless I use "high" profile). Also, timer queries perform really weird on the FOSS driver because even after a full frame cycle after having ended the query, the results will still not be available for quite some time (this never happened on legacy). Other than that the FOSS driver is pretty cool, and finally being relieved from the fear of Xorg/Kernel updates was definitely worth it.
                  The open source drivers for AMD are so good for legacy GPUs that I was even able to use an ancient ATI RV370 from 2004 in a nearly 10 year old eMachine with Ubuntu 12.04.3 smoothly rendering Unity3D, and it actually ran a lot faster than a bare Xfce session or Unity2D.

                  Meanwhile, my HD 4870 machine runs pretty awesomely with open source drivers; certainly better than Catalyst does on that card. Only thing is, to get the most out of open source drivers you do need to create an Xorg.conf, and it is a good idea to have the latest kernel.

                  My Radeon HD 7950 runs fairly well on open source now, but it's still much better to use Catalyst. This new Catalyst driver fixed a lot of bugs I had with the last beta.

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    how it works on unity? 2d performance? flash?

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Reading the 290 review, Catalyst driver still lacks a lot of performance.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X