Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Intel Core i3/i5/i7 Ubuntu Linux Performance Update

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Intel Core i3/i5/i7 Ubuntu Linux Performance Update

    Phoronix: Intel Core i3/i5/i7 Ubuntu Linux Performance Update

    Earlier today on Phoronix I delivered benchmarks showing Intel's Haswell graphics falling behind Ivy Bridge on Linux, something not seen previously and certainly not what's expected. Curious to see whether this likely Intel Haswell Linux performance regression was limited to just the HD Graphics or the processor performance overall, here's the complementary set of Sandy Bridge, Ivy Bridge, and Haswell benchmarks. These tests span the Core i3/i5/i7 series when using the latest Ubuntu 14.04 packages and the Linux 3.13 kernel with these benchmarks focusing upon the processor performance.

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=19654

  • #2
    Core i3-4130

    Well, that's interesting. Looks like the AESNI instruction set has moved down to the i3 line with Haswell. Well, some of them. 12 members have it while 4 don't. That's very interesting. I wonder when the Celeron/Pentium models (if/when they show up) will have it? Looks like the new Bay Trail Atom chips have it. That's the 3[78]xx Atoms, but not the 34xx ones.

    Comment


    • #3
      That i3 4130 is very impressive!!!!

      Comment


      • #4
        still would be interesting if there were AMD tests in there also
        like FX 8350 and 6300 or similar.. APU is slow anyway.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Tgui View Post
          That i3 4130 is very impressive!!!!
          Really?

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Rexilion View Post
            Really?
            Whats your point?

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Tgui View Post
              Whats your point?
              They were impressively bad. Maybe a sarcasm bit was lost in translation.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by carewolf View Post
                They were impressively bad. Maybe a sarcasm bit was lost in translation.
                It came in second on every test that didn't benefit from high degrees of threading. How is that 'impressively bad'?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by carewolf View Post
                  They were impressively bad. Maybe a sarcasm bit was lost in translation.
                  Cheap price and a top 75% performer. Are you really that thick?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by carewolf View Post
                    They were impressively bad. Maybe a sarcasm bit was lost in translation.
                    My point. Thank you.

                    Originally posted by willmore View Post
                    It came in second on every test that didn't benefit from high degrees of threading. How is that 'impressively bad'?
                    Originally posted by Tgui View Post
                    Cheap price and a top 75% performer. Are you really that thick?
                    This is why I responded. Why do you think that is? To the uninformed eye, it doesn't look to perform that well. According to your responses I can infer that this CPU has one of the best price/performance ratio of all.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X