Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The 60+ GPUs For The Biggest-Ever Linux GPU Comparison

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The 60+ GPUs For The Biggest-Ever Linux GPU Comparison

    Phoronix: The 60+ GPUs For The Biggest-Ever Linux GPU Comparison

    There's some very interesting tests that will be published on Phoronix in the next few days... Including the results from testing 65 different graphics cards under Linux with varying software stacks...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTcwNjI

  • #2
    Originally posted by phoronix View Post
    Phoronix: The 60+ GPUs For The Biggest-Ever Linux GPU Comparison

    There's some very interesting tests that will be published on Phoronix in the next few days... Including the results from testing 65 different graphics cards under Linux with varying software stacks...

    http://www.phoronix.com/vr.php?view=MTcwNjI

    some FireGl, but still no quadro !!

    Comment


    • #3
      Whatever happened to those PTE tests?

      Comment


      • #4
        The next round of testing is then re-testing all of the cards once again and this time looking at the closed-source AMD Catalyst and NVIDIA Linux proprietary graphics drivers.
        Seems like that is not doable because.... if i count right, twenty cards you listed there are not supported by any current fglrx . I guess you can do it for most on Precise, but if you exclude r300 cards .
        Last edited by dungeon; 05-31-2014, 04:46 AM.

        Comment


        • #5
          Michael, you should add option to tip with Bitcoin/Dogecoin and advertise that fact at respective subreddits. Not only you would drive a lot of traffic to Phoronix, but also get some extra cash from communities which will tip any project supporting their cause

          Comment


          • #6
            NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
            We'll just assume that's the 2GB version.

            Comment


            • #7
              HD2900 status

              Please Michael, when you will plug the HD 2900 XT, could you gather the entire glxinfo. There is a doublt about OpenGL 3 support on it :
              http://www.phoronix.com/forums/showt...ies-%28R600%29
              https://www.mail-archive.com/mesa-de.../msg56088.html

              Comment


              • #8
                No Nvidia Tegra K1?

                Comment


                • #9
                  HD3850 should be 512MB of RAM to issue max performance.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by whitecat View Post
                    Please Michael, when you will plug the HD 2900 XT, could you gather the entire glxinfo. There is a doublt about OpenGL 3 support on it :
                    http://www.phoronix.com/forums/showt...ies-%28R600%29
                    https://www.mail-archive.com/mesa-de.../msg56088.html
                    If per-mrt blending is an r6xx+ feature, but just not R600 and GL_EXT_draw_buffers2 is part of OpenGL 3.0 specs... then it is correct if you have only 2.1 advertised by Mesa for HD 2900
                    Last edited by dungeon; 05-31-2014, 08:54 AM.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by dungeon View Post
                      If per-mrt blending is an r6xx+ feature, but just not R600 and GL_EXT_draw_buffers2 is part of OpenGL 3.0 specs... then it is correct if you have only 2.1 advertised by Mesa for HD 2900
                      Yes, I want to be sure that glxinfo reports GL 2.1. Because currently, this is not specified anywhere. If you look at RadeonFeature web page, you expect all R600 series to be GL3.0 compliant.
                      Last edited by whitecat; 05-31-2014, 08:56 AM.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by whitecat View Post
                        Yes, I want to be sure of that. Because currently, this is not specified anywhere.
                        It is specified in the code ... there are some examples i found now here on phoronix too, when games fails because of that:

                        When turning to the Radeon HD 2900XT was the point at which the open-source driver support wouldn't go any further. The R600 Gallium3D driver on the HD 2900XT had the OpenGL glColorMaskIndexedEXT support missing, so the games failed to start.
                        http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag...d_tf2css&num=2

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by whitecat View Post
                          If you look at RadeonFeature web page, you expect all R600 series to be GL3.0 compliant.
                          Aha there ... yes there are not specified many little things, for example if i read only that i would expect HD 2900 has VDPAU/OpenMax suport implemented, but i know that that hardware even does not have UVD unit nor VCE .

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by gutigen View Post
                            Michael, you should add option to tip with Bitcoin/Dogecoin and advertise that fact at respective subreddits. Not only you would drive a lot of traffic to Phoronix, but also get some extra cash from communities which will tip any project supporting their cause
                            http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?pag...tem&px=MTU4NTE

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X