Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB SATA 3.0 SSD

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #11
    Originally posted by uid313 View Post
    It is cheap and a lot faster than a mechanical hard disk drive.
    Not as much faster as you think. Last year we bought V300's to upgrade some old Lenovo laptops. And I don't know how Michael got those test results but pretty much any sequential reads benchmark (AS-SSD for example) will show something utterly disappointing. About 150-170 MB/s on SATA-2 controllers (3 Gbps). I can't recall what exactly we got testing them on SATA-3 (6 Gbps) but it was under 350 MB/s as well. Terrible performance, even for cheap drives. I wrote to Kingston support and they replied it was normal.

    Comment


    • #12
      Originally posted by GreatEmerald View Post
      That's very nice to hear. That's one of the SSD models I was considering as well, but unfortunately the store was out of stock...
      It seems to be the most popular model these days... was thinking of getting one myself. By their official numbers, it should be one of the better performing drives while still relatively cheap, so I'll be interested in seeing this review.

      Comment


      • #13
        Originally posted by JS987 View Post
        /sigh

        Did you the paper linked in that post? What they did was essentially testing how the drives would respond to 3000 power failures in a row. Seriously, three-freaking-key. If you really care about data integrity, one is too many (that's why you'll never see a server rack without a UPS standing next to it).

        SSDs are the best thing that happened to personal computing since cheap RAM.

        Comment


        • #14
          Originally posted by prodigy_ View Post
          I wrote to Kingston support and they replied it was normal.
          They advertise compressible testing that always yields high throughput, also see my post above.

          Comment


          • #15
            Originally posted by prodigy_ View Post
            I don't know how Michael got those test results
            He has another one than you:
            Originally posted by Licaon View Post
            Regarding Kingston V300 read this post by Maxgadgetguy: http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/answer....html#11492819

            Comment


            • #16
              Originally posted by TAXI View Post
              He has another one than you:
              what?

              Comment


              • #17
                Originally posted by Licaon View Post
                They advertise compressible testing that always yields high throughput, also see my post above.
                IDK, on my own Intel 520 I get 550 MB/s sequential reads in AS-SSD. Both drives have the same SandForce SF-2281 controller. What gives?

                Comment


                • #18
                  Originally posted by Licaon View Post
                  what?
                  Did you read the link you posted? There are two versions of this SSD available and most likely Michael has other results cause he has the Taiwan version while prodigy_ has the China one. In fact that's exactly what the link says:
                  v5.0.5 Sandforce version made in Taiwan. This unit will always benchmark just fine
                  dramatic difference in performance between China or Taiwan-made models

                  Comment


                  • #19
                    Originally posted by prodigy_ View Post
                    IDK, on my own Intel 520 I get 550 MB/s sequential reads in AS-SSD. Both drives have the same SandForce SF-2281 controller. What gives?
                    read that link

                    Originally posted by TAXI View Post
                    Did you read the link you posted?
                    I did not understand what you said, not what the link I posted said, mmkay?

                    Comment


                    • #20
                      Originally posted by TAXI View Post
                      most likely Michael has other results cause he has the Taiwan version while prodigy_
                      That's quite possible but still very annoying. I already posted results from AS-SSD but I also tried HD Tune and got only 145 MB/s sequential read speed. To put this into perspective, you can get 120 MB/s from a good HDD. And in real life environment... well, these Kingston V300 drives feel somewhat faster than HDDs but not even close to Crucial m4, for example (on the same hardware).

                      So I wouldn't recommend Kingston. If you need something cheap and don't really care about write speed, go for Crucial M500.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X